Today, I have a harder time seeing McGrady being a Knick mostly because it seems pointless.
But if Curry and Q secured McGrady and the 2010 Houston second round pick I'd be okay with it.
This would add some short term expense but free up a roster spot and
2 comments:
Any reason why Houston would do it?
Well, carlos, Houston played very well in McGrady's absence. Chemistry-wise it makes sense to eliminate an elephant in a crowded room. So that would be why Houston might want to unload McGrady.
SA second reason is that as a playoff team, how many fragile pieces do you want to go to war with? Losing Mutombo and Yao was a speed-bump and eventual back-breaker. They have got to be looking at improving the infrastructure with healthier bodies because they are contenders.
So if you buy that, then who is in the market for McGrady except nobody?
Well, then it becomes a player dump with Houston getting what it can in a depreciated trade.
Houston could do far worse than Eddie Curry and Q, both useful pieces off the pine given their needs.
Of course I've speculated about this for over a year, long before the jonny come latelys.
I actually think it might be a decent trade assuming McGrady contributes and accepts being a role player.
Post a Comment